Where the Modern Romance Genre Goes Wrong

 

For many years now I neither read nor attempt to write romance novels. But I read quite a few as a child and teen, and was fond of the novels of Victoria Holt aka Jean Plaidy. I even thought of being a romance writer. A bit later in my life I read some lesbian fiction and wrote about 75 pages of a lesbian historical romance featuring a lady pirate who passed herself off as a man. (I was not a Christian at the time, and certainly wouldn't have written the 'naughty bits' of that novel since becoming a Christian.)

But since my NaNo novel is a gothic romance/sci-fi mashup, I've begun to read romances, and think about the differences between the old romances I loved and the new romances I can't stand.

The modern romance, with modern career-woman heroines a requirement even in historical fiction, looks at a love relationship (since marriage is no longer a goal) as a woman seeking a fulfilling, equality-oriented love relationship with Mr. Right, a man who meets her romantic and feminist requirements. (These Mr. Right characters can seem awfully wimpy and effeminate to the male reader--- a tamed man, not a realistic masculine man.)

If you look at what the modern romance heroine is seeking, it comes uncomfortably close to a woman who is saying that she wants a man she can use to fulfill her romantic, emotional and sexual needs. The romance heroine does not think of herself as a user--- she is a feminist after all, even if she lived in an age before feminism (as Ayla in Clan of the Cave Bear).

In an early age when Western Civilization still remembered being a Christian civilization, the ideals of Christian marriage had a greater influence. Christian marriage involves finding a person of the opposite sex and then sacrificing yourself for that person, even if that person is unworthy of your sacrifice. The model is Christ and the Church. The Church that Christ sacrificed His life for was at the moment of the crucifixion composed entirely of grubby, unpromising filthy sinners many of whom were shouting 'Crucify Him!'.

The Biblical text related to that is Ephesians 5:25-33, which begins 'Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it...' You will see that finding a person to use for your personal and sexual fulfillment is not part of it, and that's a good thing. But it's a tough job and not a win-win, equality situation. Christ was sinless, the Church is composed of sinners, and that's the model. So if you are a (relatively) moral person and your spouse has grave moral flaws, the Christian answer is not to find a better spouse as a replacement but to rejoice that you are being called to imitate Christ and make sacrifices.

While these ideals of marriage have never been lived out fully in the world of poor, flawed mortals, it had an influence on many of the older romance novels. Consider Jane Eyre. Jane is a poor girl, who takes a post as a governess and does her best to serve well in that position. Mr. Rochester is scary, rude, and fails to tell Jane, during his proposal of marriage, that it would be a fake marriage since he would remain legally wed to the madwoman in the attic. Only chance prevented Jane from giving herself to a man that she thought was her legal husband but was not.

But when Mr. Rochester was freed from his marriage by the death of his mad wife, Jane had not moved on to someone more worthy of her. She came back to him, not screaming anger at him, but serving him in his weakness and neediness.

Another flaw of the modern romance is that it is claustrophobically focused on the romantic/sexual relationship. In many an older romance novel--- say, Gone With the Wind--- you could pull out the romance scenes and there would be a good story left. In a modern romance, all of the other stuff--- the interesting stuff, back when I was a child and first began to read romances--- is excised.

Which explains why the romance is more limited in its appeal. The German writer Hedwig Courths-Mahler had her little 'fairy tales for grown-ups' published in special editions to be given out to the men fighting World War One. Today's romances have far less appeal to the male reader. (Unless they are the sort with explicit sex scenes. One of my favorite novels in my old romance-reading days was a bodice-ripper historical romance which a teen boy of my acquaintance was using for 'entertaining impure thoughts' material, a more-available substitute for actual porn.)

Conformity to feminist dictates also weakens the modern romance. In Jane Eyre the heroine is a poor girl who must earn a living, but who can be saved from her poverty by a good marriage though she never becomes a husband-hunter. Feminism would demand that Jane Eyre have access to a good career to which she becomes sufficiently devoted that she would accept Mr. Rochester only if her relationship with him didn't interfere with her career. And her Mr. Rochester would have been a tamed down, feminism-obedient poor thing that would be hardly worth having, anyway. So the modern writer would gift him with a bodybuilder's body without the obsessive gym work that requires, and a really impressive set of genitalia. Ugh.

To write a romance that is more endurable for the woman of taste, this is what I would do--- take the best of the older romances as a model. Ignore the modern trends. Write as if the romance side of the story were more like a slightly overdeveloped sub-plot rather than making it the whole story. And question any ideas in your head that are 'what the feminists say a relationship should be' or 'what the romance publishing industry say a relationship should be', and find your own path.

Have you ever read romance novels? Do you love them or hate them? What are their good points and what could use improvement? Could a man write a good romance novel? If you are a man, would you consider it?

Some Blog posts by Mike Duran about the Romance Genre
Author Mike Duran is not a big romance fan, nor is he thrilled by the dominance of romance novels in both the Christian and secular book marketplace. But his opinions on the genre--- and the blog comments they generate--- might be of use in forming ideas of where the modern romances have gone wrong and what can be done to set things write. Or it might just make you angry enough to have the energy to write the Great Romance Novel that will prove Mike Duran WRONG.

What Do Jane Austen and Contemporary Romance Novels Really Have in Common?
Why Men Don't Read Romance
How Paranormal Romance Killed the Undead

My page at NaNoWriMo:
http://nanowrimo.org/participants/ilsabein
Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt
  

Goals: You Must Pay the Price

 This post is part of the Five Year Project/Do You Have Goals blog hop.

My Five Year Goals: 
1. Finish the Sons of Jacob poem series.
2. Build up this blog til it's popular like Mike Duran's.
3. Finish 3 novels.

Setting goals. It's kind of like being a kid at Christmas Winter Holiday and making a Christmas Santa Claus list. But it's not enough to set the goals. You must follow through. And the first step to that is being willing to pay the price.

Each goal comes with its own built-in price, and this differs from writer to writer. For example, some writers, unlike me, didn't learn spelling and English grammar in their school, and so part of their price is to go back and study these things so they can write well-crafted or at least correctly spelled and understandable English sentences.

A novel-writing goal always comes with a reading 'price'. You need to be well-read in your genre--- the classics of the genre, older genre works, and today's newest offerings. You don't HAVE to follow the latest trends in a genre, but you DO need to know what these trends are to work within the genre with confidence. (You might find your writing ideas place you in an emerging subgenre. Or maybe you will start a whole new subgenre.) So perhaps we all need to include 'read 3 novels a month in my genre(s).' Not to mention outside-of-genre and nonfiction reading. (Note to mainstream and literary fiction writers: those are 'genres', too. At least as far as the reading requirement goes.)

Sometimes the 'price' means overcoming problems of disorganization, as in the case of a person with AD/HD. I have Asperger Syndrome, which comes with 'executive function deficit'. Which essentially means AD/HD. So you may need to search out organizing tips for AD/HD people to find organizational ways that work for YOU.

You may need to overcome psychological issues. I have a sort of chronic writer's block which when it hits makes it next to impossible to work any further on the current WIP, or even on any writing. I am currently reading a number of books which help writers with these issues.

Self-confidence is a major problem for writers. Your 'price' likely will include working on this. I can recommend 'Write for your Life' by Lawrence Block as a help with that. (It's a bit new-agey, but the affirmations technique is also recommended by Christian pastor Norman Vincent Peale in 'The Power of Positive Thinking'.)

So as you look over your goals, think: are you willing to pay the price? What will that price be? What steps can you take to pay it?

My goals update:
1. Have written 2 of the poems and taken notes on the third.
2. Am working on posting on this blog and commenting on other blogs more regularly.
3. Planning to participate in NaNoWriMo with a cross-genre novel (Jane Eyre inspired Gothic with a sci-fi setting) that doesn't seem as complex as my previous, unfinished NaNo novels. Currently at work writing an outline of a favorite Gothic novel that will serve as a model for my own novel's outline. Writing starts Nov. 1. My NaNo page: http://nanowrimo.org/participants/ilsabein





Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

Spotting "Fake Christians" along Doctrinal Lines

I just read a disturbing blog post at an Evangelical blog that I follow: 7 questions that help spot fake Christians Go there and read to understand what I'm talking about.

Back? OK. Now, in my opinion the term 'Fake Christian' should be reserved for an in-name-only Christian who has no commitment to the faith, is not 'saved' and is likely not bound for heaven. For those of us who are non-fake Christians, that's an important distinction. A nominal Christian--- who usually knows little of the faith and either does not attend church or does so for social reasons only--- needs to be educated on the faith, and may cast a bad light on the faith by their actions since some perceive them as Christians.

There were several things that bothered me about the 'Seven Questions'.

1. The tone of the questions was very specific to a certain type of Evangelical Christian. People outside those Christians circles, no matter that they are devoted Christians, may be perceived as 'fake Christians'.

2. Some of the 'Seven Questions' can be answered only by God. 'Are they controlled by the Holy Spirit?' 'Do they have a new nature?' Only God can know for sure.

3. The 'Seven Questions' encourage us to disobey the 'judge not' command of Jesus. If we are examining other people's lives for clues that they are not Spirit-controlled, we are judging them in a way Christ forbids. Besides the sin aspect of this, when real non-Christians see us making such judgments they decide that Christians are all unloving and judgmental. Plus, we will find situations like this: Jerry looks at possible 'fake Christian' John and sees that John still drinks a beer now and then, still smokes cigarettes, and still goes to visit his elderly homosexual great-uncle Bill in the nursing home without preaching fire-and-brimstone at him. "Aha!" Jerry says. "A fake Christian!" No, it's more likely that John is simply from a church with different teachings (doctrines) that does not require giving up alcohol and tobacco for salvation, and that teaches that one should show the love of Christ to homosexual persons, even if those persons are seriously sinful (as not all homosexuals are, some are celibate, voluntarily or otherwise).

4. The seventh question may be designed to expose Catholics as 'fake Christians'. Catholics ask for the prayers of saints in the same way they ask their living friends to pray for him, but certain hostile-to-Catholic Evangelicals go around preaching that Catholics trust to Mary instead of Jesus for salvation.

5. This 'Seven Questions' post leads to another post with a lot more evangelization questions. One of the questions on this second post, meant to be asked to the subject of the evangelization and which presumably detects the 'unsaved' state, is 'Are you 100% sure you'd go to heaven if you died?" This is a question which is specific to the 'once-saved always safe' dogma believed by some but not all Evangelicals and which is not what the Bible and Early Church teach. It IS possible for a Christian to fall away from the faith, even to become hostile to the faith. Some even go from being a 'saved' Christian child to being an adult who, like Josef Stalin, hates and kills Christians. The only way the 'once saved always safe' believers get around this fact is to claim that those who fall away weren't saved properly. Which leads to what I experienced as a child in Presbyterian Sunday School. I 'got saved' by praying a version of the 'Sinner's Prayer', but my life was not wholly transformed in the way some Christian books said would happen. I was the same little kid with problems (undiagnosed Asperger Syndrome) which didn't go away and make me like the joyful spirit-filled, doubt-free Christians in the books. So, I figured I wasn't REALLY saved--- a possibility the OSAS folks mentioned. So I got saved again. And again. And always worried I was hell-bound and without Christ in my life. The uncertainty caused by that false doctrine may have contributed from my later falling away from the faith for many years. Well, now I'm a Catholic. I know I'm not 100% guaranteed of heaven because I have the free will to turn away from God at any time, and as a mere human I can never be sure 100% of what choices I will make in the future.

The Take-Away for Christians
We are not called by Christ to judge who is for-sure saved and who not. Even when we are in the position of helping to choose someone for a responsible position in the Church we can only judge whether that person, right now, seems to be a faithful Christian living a Christian life. So if we want to evangelize, rather than judging we should be dropping 'seeds' of faith whether we are talking to a foul-mouthed streetwalker or a Christian evangelist or even the Pope.

The Take-Away for Christian Writers
In our local church we learn what our denomination (or 'non-denomination') teaches about what it means to be a Christian and what the Christian life would be like. And some denominations are more accurate than others. But as writers we are speaking to a broader group of Christians than at our church, and we need to understand the other Christian 'faith-languages' so we will not be leading other Christians astray by our writing.

The Take-Away for Non-Christian Writers
Wow! Thanks for sticking with me through this post. As an ex-non-Christian myself I know it may have been dull. But the take-home for you is simply this: for a Christian, the word 'Christian' has a specific meaning. It may vary a bit around the edges but the core is the same. (To discover this meaning, perhaps read C. S. Lewis's Mere Christianity. Or at least the common Evangelical tract The Four Spiritual Laws--- Google it.) Some non-Christian writers of the past have used 'Christian' to mean 'a nice person', but Christians don't understand it that way--- in fact, Christians believe that many Christians are not nice at all, though nicer than that specific person would be without Christ. Other non-Christian writers use 'Christian' to mean 'those uneducated Fundamentalists I've read about and don't like'. Well, if you are on that path I won't try to talk you out of it. I might have done the same thing at one point in my life. But I think the more sophisticated and knowledgeable among the non-Christian readers--- the only readers you will get with that approach--- may take exception, perhaps because they have Christian family members and friends that the love, and may even respect as thinking human beings who simply have the 'wrong' opinion on the religion thing.

Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

Kerry Nietz on “Amish Vampires in Space”

Kerry Nietz on “Amish Vampires in Space”

Amish Vampires in Space--- yes, it's an actual book. How cool is that? Click on the link above to see a great interview with the book's author.


Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

NaNoWriMo: Challenge Accepted!

Peggy Eddleman: Will Write For Cookies: This NaNoNewb wants to know: Are you in?
I came across the link above while scanning through the blogs I follow. (Please click on the post and read the link.) I myself am not a newb to Nano, but I had already decided I wasn't going to participate this November.

But in the past couple of days I've had the idea of doing a major change-of-pace project to outwit my chronic writers-block problem. I've had the idea of writing a gothic romance novel.

I know. EW, ICK, romance! It could lead to KISSING! But as a kid I read Jane Eyre, sort of the forerunner of the modern gothic romance. And I read Victoria Holt's Mistress of Mellyn when I was a teenager or thereabouts. (Victoria Holt also wrote under the name Jean Plaidy, writing historical novels about British queens under that name, and I loved Jean Plaidy books when I was young.)

My idea, which is more as a treatment/cure for my chronic writers-block than anything, is to outline Jane Eyre and Mistress of Mellyn, and from that create my own 'typical-gothic' outline complete with an orphaned-and-threatened heroine and a brooding, secretive man as love interest.

And then, I'm going to put the story in outer space. Specifically, in the Terran-empire-type setting I've been creating for my Starship Destine project, on a planet bought and settled a few generations back by an eccentric family, whose descendants now are that world's aristocratic caste.

My strategy will be to NOT reveal any details of the work save the brief outline I've already put up on the Nano web site (my profile at Nano), and some character names when I've devised them. I will be interacting on the NaNo forums on a daily basis as well as posting updates on this blog or on my Facebook page. My nickname at Nano is Ilsabein, which seemed like a good idea nearly eight years ago when I first joined that site.

Are you participating in Nano this year? Why or why not? If so, what is your project this year. More importantly, do you have a strategy to get the most out of your participation this year? And what is your goal for this year's Nano?



Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

How to Write a 'Buy my Book' Post in a Facebook Group

Actual 'buy my book' post.

For many of us who use Facebook groups, forums, Yahoo groups and such, this post title probably makes you cringe. "Someone's encouraging people to post more bookspam in our groups!" you are exclaiming. "Awful! More spammed-to-death groups are sure to result!"

Don't worry, folks. Bookspam in groups is a pet peeve of mine, too. Not to mention a moral issue since our host, Facebook, also sells advertising at quite reasonable rates. Trying to get free advertising in the Facebook groups feels a bit like swiping a candy bar from the mini-mart.

But the one thing that strikes me about most bookspam self-promotion of books in groups and forums is how ineffective they are. If people would only take the time to learn how to be more effective before they post those self-promos, they would have a skill that they could use in more ethical self-promotion.

Here are some of the common flaws in buy-my-book posts:

1. Bare links, with no comment or intro. They are demanding that their potential book-buyer follow the link to discover what the book is about. Fix: always post a tagline--- a one-sentence summary of the book--- along with the link.
2. Abstract tagline. You know, as in 'This book is about the struggle of man vs nature.' What man? What nature? The tagline should read more like this: An accountant wakes up to discover he's been transformed into a cockroach, making it more difficult to get to work on time.'
3. Blatantly ignoring posted rules. If the group that is being exposed to the book promo has a sticky post at the top of the group's page stating no self-promotion allowed, or no off-topic posts, and the buy-my-booker self-promotes anyway, it shows contempt for the group and its members.
4. Promo and run. This is when a person joins the group, posts his promo, and then doesn't participate in the group until he feels it's time for his next promo. Fix: follow the rule of thumb by posting ten comments or posts on stuff that ISN'T related to you or your book before you even mention your book.
5. Miss Speling. If you misspell words in your self-promo, everyone who catches your mistake will presume you are a hopelessly bad amateur writer and warn their friends against buying your book. Fix: Learn. To. Spell. Spellcheck is not enough. If you want to call yourself a writer, you need to at least learn the most basic tools of the craft.
6. The Christian obligation ploy. Found in Christian fiction groups, this is when a writer insists that if group members are REAL Christians, they will show their Christian charity by allowing him to promote his book as often and as clumsily as he wants. Similar guilt trips can be inflicted by Amway or Avon sellers. The extreme is when it is insisted that the group members must show their Christian charity by actually making a purchase. Other groups, both religious and other, may suffer from similar unfair appeals to group loyalty. Fix: Never, ever do this. 
7. The hundred-group campaign. This is when the misguided would-be author joins and promos in a hundred or more different Facebook groups. With such large numbers it is impossible to participate in these groups in any meaningful way. So the buy-my-booker is essentially a stranger to the group who visits only to 'advertise'.
8. The aggressive group member. This is the person who makes a point of saying sarcastic or harsh things to other group members to get noticed. And then posts a book promo. Fix: don't alienate group members and then expect to sell them books.

Of course, all misuse of groups and forums is an amateurish mistake. When you read about using social media to build a writer-platform for yourself, this is NOT what they mean. Social media is useful when you use it to build up relationships with people. And the only was to build up a relationship is to take your focus OFF what the other person can do for you--- buy your book, review your book, promote your book--- and focus on what you can do for the other person.

If you participate in a group or forum, let it be because you are interested in the discussions that the group is about. Participate politely--- treat people as you would if you were there with them in person. In many forums, you can put a signature with your blog's link in it. In Facebook, every post leads to your personal Facebook page. In both of these instances, other group members are able to get more closely connected to you if they want to do so. You don't have to do any buy-my-book stuff that will just offend people.




Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

Poetry Sunday: Fragment of an Unnamed Haibun Novel

Haibun is a form of Japanese traditional writing which combines prose with a haiku. I thought it might be interesting to try something similar to that, prose and short poems mingled.

What I did was an opening to a story about werecats and werewolves. It begins with a haiku which is not strictly traditional, since it lacks a season-word and is not about cherry blossoms or peonies or the like.

I thought I would share it this Sunday just for the heck of it. It's very new and unedited.... written this morning..... but I thought I'd share it while it is still in progress.

Fragment of an Unnamed Haibun-Novel

dogs howl
while cats nibble at the
government cheese

That Saturday we went to the food bank. We had to borrow Hagger's truck, which worked, unlike Papa's which was broken and needed gas and tires. Hagger had nodded at that. "Cats 'ud be hard on the tires." Which was a stupid thing to say, but what could you expect? Hagger was only a dog.
We got to St. Paul's Moravian Church about an hour after the food bank opened. 'Sats 9-12,' the sign said. And pointed to the concrete path which lead around the church. Toward the back, there were some steep steps and we stopped.

We. I suppose I ought to explain that. 'We' meant me--- Inae, daughter of the most prominent of the local cat-lords--- and Mishkina. My afrit. Who, I suppose, is not precisely an afrit any more.
The legends say that when a pure-of-heart young human child sprinkles a young afrit with holy water, the afrit does not die or disappear from the human world, but becomes transformed, and follows the human child around for life as a protector.

When I did it I wasn't thinking of the legend. If I had I would have assumed it didn't apply to me. I wasn't a human, nor all that pure-of-heart after what I did to the Saint Michael statue, according to Pastor. And by reckoning in human years-of-age I wasn't even in the young-child category any more, though I had been by the reckoning of my own people--- still was, as for that.




Shared on Poetry Pantry #171.
 
The cat in the picture is Katniss, daughter of Chachamaru, older sister of Therese, younger sister and possible daughter of Joel. Yes, my kitties are naughty.

Recommended Reading:

For many years I didn't dare to tackle writing haiku. On the one hand there were those that thought haiku were something for schoolchildren to do on assignment. On the other, I knew that good haiku probably had a lot of rules I didn't know about. Recently I acquired some quality books on haiku, and found them very inspiring, though often my haiku-ideas turn into sijo, which is a somewhat longer Korean poetic form.

It includes haiku in English by poets I've actually heard of: Ezra Pound, Wallace Stevens, Amy Lowell, Langston Hughes, e. e. cummings, Allen Ginsberg, Jack Kerouac, and Richard Wright, among others.

It's a good antidote to the notion that good haiku in English can only be written by Western Neo-Buddhists who reject everything in Western civilization in favor of often-romantic images of the civilization of the East.

Along with a book of good translations of classic Japanese haiku, this book makes a great introduction to the haiku form. Poets and writers ought to consider owning the book. It also makes good sense for classroom teachers and homeschooling moms.

My favorite haiku in the book, so far, is this one by Paul Violi:

Don't look at my face.
No change, just large bills.
One wrong move will be your last.

I mean, WOW! A poem that doubles as a bank-robber's note! It makes me long to run out and rob a bank, but then I'd have to go to confession.

Haiku in English: The First Hundred Years (Amazon.com)
A Review of Haiku in English: The First Hundred Years, by one of the poets included in the book, Melissa Allen.
 

Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

Indie Life: Competing With the Slush Pile

 This post is part of the Indie Life blog hop.

Writing life in the old days--- back then, every publisher had a slush pile. This was a backlog of unsolicited manuscripts that arrived at every publishers' door. Some low-wage employee of the publisher would be assigned to sort through the slush manuscripts.

Most slush pile manuscripts could be disposed of after a glance at the first page. Failures in spelling and grammar, clumsy sentences with unfathomable meanings, and just an air of mind-numbingly dull about the manuscript told the tale. Such manuscripts were, rightly, sent back after this slight evaluation.

Other manuscripts needed more attention before the reader could tell they weren't what was wanted, and this was the place to be for a new writer. Your manuscript was deemed worthy of a bit of attention and you might warrant a personal note on the rejection slip. Those notes meant you were a real writer, and that someone out there thought you ought to keep trying, that someday you would produce a manuscript that would make some publisher some money.

The slush-pile days are over at most publishers. Given today's minimum wage laws and soon-to-be-required benefits, nearly all publishers reckon they can't afford to hire someone to read their way through a slush pile, and so they issue a decree that only agented manuscripts are accepted. And most agents don't want slush pile manuscripts, either.

But for the indie writer, the slush pile still exists--- and if we are not part of it, we are competing with it.

Now, for most of us indie writers we spend a lot of time cocooned in a virtual world of other indie and small press writers. We don't contact non-writing readers much until our writing career takes off and we start to get fans coming to our blogs and author Facebook and Twitter pages. But ask a reader who has tried an indie book or two, and chances are you will hear some slush-pile novel horror stories.

Indie books, conclude the reader, are bad, and they will stick with traditionally published books from now on. But the traditionally published world also has their slush-pile-worthy books. They are just hidden away, and not out there competing with well-written books for readership.

This is what you must do to compete with the slush pile: You must make your book stand out from the pack in three ways.

1. You must know enough about spelling, grammar and sentence structure that you can ensure your manuscript is correct. You may have beta readers and hired editors to catch mistakes for you--- but if you don't know the rules yourself, you have no way to know if they are correct. If your school education shortchanged you in this area--- in other words, if you are under 50--- you need to educate yourself. Errors in this area are a well-known mark of the slush-pile writer.

2. The average reader may be ignorant of a lot of things. He may think that World War 2 was fought between the armed forces of Adolf Hitler and George Washington. He may think that Shakespeare was just some dead white guy who wrote boring stuff. But even the most ill-informed of readers expects their authors to be filled to the brim with correct information, and if they catch you in an error of fact, they will assume you are just another slush-pile writer not worth reading. Enhance your education by reading books on cultural literacy and history-for-dummies, and then read on from there.

3. It's not enough to be correctly spelled and culturally literate. You need to show, right from the start, that you are not a bore. This means dumping the prologue about the hundred-year elven war or the history of your main character from the date of his grandfather's birth and other bits of tedium writers fiddle with before they get down to the beef of it. Concentrate on the central story. And don't whine about how some other writer got away with prologues and genealogies and such and is a famous writer. YOU are not a famous writer, and you are not going to be one if you can't convince skeptical readers you are not going to bore them to death.

The writer in the old days had to convince one reader at a publisher's office that he was a competent writer. You, as an indie writer, have to convince reader after reader after reader of the same thing. Your first few chapters that are made available as a free sample have to show your prowess in the three areas mentioned above. And the rest of your book must match it. Do this, and you will rise above the indie fiction slush pile. Don't do it, and you are condemned to be a part of the slush pile other indie writers are complaining about.

I will 'like' your Facebook author page (unless it's porny or something). Just go to MY page (link below) and post a comment 'hey, you said you'd like my author page' and give your author page link. I will 'like' the page as soon as I see that (with my personal account, so that it counts). Feel free to 'like' my page in return.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

Why I didn't Comment on your Blog Post Today

 I didn't comment on your blog today. It's not that I found your blog post uninteresting and unworthy of consideration. It's not that I didn't have something to say to you about it.

It's because when I came to write my comment, I found you had the word verification step enabled. Which is a great trial to those of us with less-than-perfect vision. As is the alternative audio verification which tends towards the inaudible.

I may have tried, and failed, and given up. Or I may have saved myself the trouble and just given up in advance.

I used to like word verification, back when word verification words were less distorted and I could read them. I even collected interesting word verification words in a notebook. But technology marches on, and word verification words are now too unreadable for me.

My blogs don't have the word verification step. Instead, my blog posts are monitored. Some are monitored only after a certain number of days have passed since the post was made. On one--- a blog on a sensitive topic--- all posts are monitored.

I am not inundated by blog spam. In fact, I rarely have any. When I do, it is on older posts, and caught by the monitoring of older blog posts.

I'm sorry, blogger, that I wasn't able to comment on your blog post today. But since I could not, I at least thought I would let you know why.

Please feel free to share this blog post around--- with a link back to this blog, please.
Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

How to Support an Author’s New Book: 11 Ideas For You | Writers In The Storm Blog

How to Support an Author’s New Book: 11 Ideas For You | Writers In The Storm Blog

A great blog post by Chuck Sambuchino on how to support an author-friend's new book. Please visit and read the post for some great suggestions.

I have writer-friends now, all with new books to usher into the world. I met them through this blog and through the Christian Science Fiction and Fantasy blog tour.

I met Amanda Borenstadt when she offered me a review copy of her book, Syzygy. I remember I had low expectations, it being a self-published book, but in the end I was quite impressed. And I made a friend.

I think I first heard of Karina Fabian through Amanda Borenstadt's blog. She, like Amanda, is a Catholic, and so I was pleased to see some Catholics writing SF and Fantasy--- since I already knew a lot of Evangelical Christian SF and Fantasy writers through the blog tour. I read a few of Karina's books, and then with her 'Live and Let Fly' I became a HUGE Karina Fabian fan. You know, like Annie Wilkes in that Stephen King book. ;)

I've since made other writing friends, Tony Breeden, Declan Finn, Kellie Hill, Krisi Kelley, and others. And sometimes I feel a little swamped. Gotta read this, gotta review that, is there something I can do to help so-and-so with the other thing.....

But it's nice to be able to help a writing friend, when you can.

Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

In Mourning for my Kindle

 

And now it is time to sing sad songs of the death of Kindles.....

I got my Kindle a few years ago, when a Chinese businessman who was a friend of my late father gave the family quite a large sum of money. Mother shared it out with family members and I got a Kindle with my share.

I loved it. Unlike trying to read an ebook on my computer, reading it on Kindle was a lot like reading a real book. Plus I could enlarge the print size to something comfortable.

I took advantage of the many opportunities open to Kindle owners to save money on books. I went to ManyBooks.net and downloaded free ebooks. I also picked up many books that were only temporarily free. I got new stuff to read at a time when I thought poverty was going to condemn me to nothing more than rereading what books I already owned, and reading the few interesting books in the local library.

But the problem with poor people and gadgets is that the gadgets always die, and the cost of replacing them is high.

My Kindle cost about $200-250 when new. I despaired at the thought of ever replacing that. And at the thought of the Kindle books I had bought--- often for 99 cents, but it was money all the same--- and could now never read.

I checked on the Amazon.com web site and found they had a Kindle model for $69 dollars. Not quite so far out of reach. I thought of crowdsourcing it. If 35 people each gave $2--- but I don't know ANY people I could hit up for money, especially for something non-essential. (And as for those people that I know a little, I don't really want the relationship to be changed/warped forever into that of pauper and benefactor.)

I then thought of offering to write reviews on Amazon.com of people's books in exchange for a little money. And then kicked myself in the butt (or tried to) for not remembering that I couldn't accept ebooks for review until I had a new Kindle to read them on. Besides which, I don't like writing reviews because I suspect I'm not very good at it (though I'm sure there are many people who would take any Amazon review they could get and be glad of it.)

I know that of course one can read ebooks on a computer. I downloaded the software. I just can't imagine sitting down to read a book off my computer. I read a few chapters from Caleb-Seven this afternoon, but even though I rather like the book I can't really see myself finishing it reading off my laptop. 

Let's face it, I need a new Kindle. Only I DON'T really need a new Kindle. Or a computer or a television or an internet connection or indoor plumbing and central heating and all the many other things Third-World people do without every day. I know that if I were a better person I would just look at the problem of my dead Kindle and just 'offer it up' to God for the salvation of poor people in real need. Only I'm not there yet, and I want me a new Kindle. *sigh*

Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

Insecure Writer’s Support Group Blog Hop | Renee DeAngelo

Insecure Writer’s Support Group Blog Hop | Renee DeAngelo

Please click on and visit the link above, a new participant in the Insecure Writer's Support Group.
 
One thing that makes me better at being an insecure writer is that should I ever come to realize that I am good at doing a certain thing, that thing becomes trivial and not worth doing.

Take my poetry. I started seriously writing poetry in 1988, and began submitting to poetry zines. In 1989 I was first published. I accumulated quite a volume of poetry written in those first 3 years. But once I realized I was good at it, I decided poetry wasn't what 'real' writers did, and so for the next few years wrote the opening chapters of about two dozen novels instead of poetry.

The advantage of writing  novel beginnings destined never to have endings is that no one can read them and judge them harshly. And I don't like being judged harshly. Somehow I was able to overcome that fear and submit to poetry zines for a while. And I blog poems and self-published a book (which is currently being revised and expanded). I suppose it is 'safe' for me to do that with poems because Poetry Doesn't Count, No One's Buying Poetry.

So I am a poet now. But then there's this.

I have been reading about a kind of Japanese poem called a haibun. The haibun is a haiku combined with a section of prose. The two, poetry and prose, compliment one another and are a unified work. I have just written my first haibun recently.

And in the novel I'm currently just beginning, I started things off with a haiku. And then the chapter continues in prose. Which will make the whole novel, in my mind at least, a haibun. A poem. And poems are something it's safe for me to write, finish and share with others.

Pretty sneaky, huh?



Please consider 'liking' us on Facebook.
http://www.facebook.com/NissaAnnakindt

How Writers and Bloggers Can Use the Rule of 5 To Become Discoverable

How Writers and Bloggers Can Use the Rule of 5 To Become Discoverable

The above post, over at How to Blog a Book, is very inspirational. Do you have a book--- or an author blog--- that seems to be invisible? The Rule of 5 is sound advice to help you make your book and/or blog more visible.

I'm not going to repeat what is found over at How to Blog a Book. I want you to go there and read the original for yourself. Right now.

Yes, right now.




OK, what did you think of the article? How will you use what you learned from it?

The first thing I learned is that I need to 'show up' more often here by writing blog posts. OK, I pretty much already knew that. The chronic writer's block which plagues my fiction writing has also extended into my blogging life--- perhaps because the instant gratification to be had on Facebook makes it all seem to be too much effort. But lately on my 'controversial' Facebook page I've had some lessons on the down-side of that instant gratification--- others can gratify themselves instantly at my expense, as in the left-wing racialist page that not only posted a picture of me and called me ugly, but posted a picture of my sweet little disabled kitten Therese having a bath, and said she was ugly, too. Which was so unfair because she wasn't looking her best scared out of her wits in a plastic tub of water! So I had to work on a blog I have that duplicates the content of my 'controversial' page, where I have more control over the ability of stray commenters to be abusive.

So--- I've got to blog more. The problem is, blog about what?

I once read the blog of a fine Christian gentleman who had written a self-published novel. His blog posted about the various steps on the way to self-publication. And then the book was out, and he had nothing to blog about. I suppose he was too modest a gentleman to put himself forward by blogging about himself.

But as writers, our selves are what we own. Our writing--- good or bad--- is the product of those selves. Sharing about ourselves to some extend is something that builds interest in a writer and his work.

I happen to be a Christian, and so I believe in the Golden Rule: Do unto others as you would have others do unto you. So the second topic to blog about is others. Sharing the blog posts of others, as I am doing now, helps spread the reach of their blog. And if some of those others are checking their stats regularly and see they are getting new readers coming at them from your blog, they might be grateful.

'Trending topics' is another thing to blog about, but that must be personalized. Most 'hot topics' don't thrill me. Either they are about allegedly famous people I've never heard of, or they are about people doing evil things and make me want to look the other way rather than spread the news. Rather than blog about the top trending item, I will want to blog about something that is a hot topic among people who share my interests and ideals. For example, many people I know and respect are concerned about the rise in hate-crime murders of Christians in Africa and the Middle East, which are not being reported. That might be something to blog about.

One last thought, though. It does little good to 'show up' if you are metaphorically showing up in your pajama top, with unbrushed hair, and no pants. Many young self-published writers write blog posts that are misspelled, ungrammatical, and sometimes verge on being incomprehensible. These young writers send a message with every such post: 'I'm no good at writing.' Work on these basic skills first before starting a blog--- or self-publishing a book.